IterativeCommenter Conception
At this point, the name is not yet attached.
Tomorrow's TODO
When reading and commenting with URL specification, it is more natural to write below
It is desirable if ❌ telomeres can be maintained
Check if you can
Only one 🌀 emerges each day.
It's more natural to write this down too.
[Write the summary above.
If you try to write it down below, you'll need to change the previous note's acquisition as well.
How should it be?
I was envisioning a design with the beginning as a summary and the bottom as a conversation space, but then the input wouldn't change unless a human updates the top summary.
Well, the fragments we see in page memory change, or other new fragments are added and we pick them up, so what's the point?
Instead of going off on a tangent like the original Recurrent Notes, it stays around the summary at the beginning and gradually explores outward. That sounds like it would be beneficial.
Experiment with multiple pickle
If you try to write it down below, you'll need to change the previous note's acquisition as well.
...
That sounds like it would be beneficial.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/IterativeCommenterの着想 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.